0x1af4 -ۈlzep-\i1hRJ o3vr Return-Path: rt-cpan-org-return@perl.org Received: from zmta04.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (LHLO zmta04.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com) (10.5.81.11) by zmail14.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com with LMTP; Mon, 18 Nov 2013 11:06:10 -0500 (EST) Received: from zmta04.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zmta04.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A08BDA0C9 for ; Mon, 18 Nov 2013 11:06:10 -0500 (EST) Received: from int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23]) by zmta04.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 954E9D1F23 for ; Mon, 18 Nov 2013 11:06:10 -0500 (EST) Received: from mx1.redhat.com (ext-mx14.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.110.19]) by int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id rAIG6A3W024510 for ; Mon, 18 Nov 2013 11:06:10 -0500 Received: from rtcpan.develooper.com (rtcpan.develooper.com [207.171.7.181]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id rAIG69Uk032392 for ; Mon, 18 Nov 2013 11:06:09 -0500 Received: by rtcpan.develooper.com (Postfix, from userid 536) id D3030FA; Mon, 18 Nov 2013 08:06:08 -0800 (PST) Precedence: normal Subject: [rt.cpan.org #90483] missing license file From: "Alexandr Ciornii via RT" Reply-To: bug-Text-ParseWords@rt.cpan.org In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: X-RT-Loop-Prevention: rt.cpan.org RT-Ticket: rt.cpan.org #90483 Managed-BY: RT 4.0.18 (http://www.bestpractical.com/rt/) RT-Originator: CHORNY@cpan.org To: mmaslano@redhat.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" X-RT-Original-Encoding: utf-8 Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2013 11:06:08 -0500 X-RedHat-Spam-Score: -1.9 (BAYES_00,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.68 on 10.5.11.23 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.68 on 10.5.110.19 On Mon Nov 18 10:37:28 2013, mmaslano@redhat.com wrote: > It would be a big help if you have better defined license. License > text in .pm file would be enough. Will do in next version. > I found Perl license in Makefile.PL, > so we assumed it's Perl (GPL+ or Artistic). Is it correct? yes -- Alexandr Ciornii, http://chorny.net "݈laJeJe@lm1h N¿Copyright 2011, Google Inc. All rights reserved. Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions are met: * Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer. * Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above copyright notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer in the documentation and/or other materials provided with the distribution. * Neither the name of Google Inc. nor the names of its contributors may be used to endorse or promote products derived from this software without specific prior written permission. THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE COPYRIGHT HOLDERS AND CONTRIBUTORS "AS IS" AND ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE ARE DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE COPYRIGHT OWNER OR CONTRIBUTORS BE LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE, DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY